{"id":64794,"global_id":"krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute?id=64794","global_id_lineage":["krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute?id=64794"],"author":"397","status":"publish","date":"2025-04-03 16:15:40","date_utc":"2025-04-03 20:15:40","modified":"2025-04-03 16:15:40","modified_utc":"2025-04-03 20:15:40","url":"https:\/\/krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute\/event\/caplan-rosen-lecture-spring-2025-karin-zitzewitz\/","rest_url":"https:\/\/krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute\/wp-json\/tribe\/events\/v1\/events\/64794","title":"Caplan-Rosen Lecture Spring 2025: Karin Zitzewitz","description":"
Asking Historical Questions of Contemporary (Indian) Art<\/strong><\/p>\n This talk uses Shilpa Gupta\u2019s\u00a0Listening Air\u00a0<\/em>(2019\u20132023) to consider how best to take a squarely art historical perspective on contemporary art. By historical, I mean one driven less by the question,\u00a0what does this work of art mean?<\/em>\u00a0than by the question,\u00a0how did this work of art come to be?<\/em><\/p>\n Porous and world-hailing, Gupta\u2019s text-driven works openly participate in their conditions of possibility. Indeed, her works necessitate reconsideration of what sorts of materials can and should shape the historical account of their becoming. They allow us to explore the potential for rethinking the subject\u2014<\/em>meaning, the grammatical or agentic \u201cI\u201d\u2014of contemporary art history. For, while contemporary art retains its consistent appeal to \u201cthe now,\u201d it is today rare for art\u2019s form to serve as the subject of its historicity, as it did for much of the 20th<\/sup>\u00a0century. Indeed, an ambivalence about the inability to center formal change as historical change\u2014and a confusion about what might serve as art\u2019s alternative historical agency\u2014underlies a great deal of contemporary art discourse. This paper proposes an alternative approach to this question, one centered on questions of research method.<\/p>\n