{"id":58786,"date":"2024-03-12T22:58:53","date_gmt":"2024-03-13T02:58:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute\/?p=58786"},"modified":"2024-03-12T22:58:54","modified_gmt":"2024-03-13T02:58:54","slug":"emre-considers-the-marks-on-the-wall-and-on-the-page-where-the-human-appears","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/krieger.jhu.edu\/humanities-institute\/2024\/03\/12\/emre-considers-the-marks-on-the-wall-and-on-the-page-where-the-human-appears\/","title":{"rendered":"Emre considers the marks on the wall\u2014and on the page\u2014where the human appears"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Last week, AGHI hosted Professor Merve Emre (Wesleyan) as this year’s Macksey Lecture speaker for a double-header in both Baltimore and DC. Well known as a public essayist, interviewer extraordinaire, and consummate instructor of writing as a craft, Emre presented two very different papers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The first, “On American Miniaturism: Too Close Reading” (March 7), highlighted how the contemporary form of the very, very short story\u2014sometimes in as few as two short lines of dialogue\u2014actually offers a fascinating opportunity for authors to explore the limits of subjectivity. Authors like Lydia Davis<\/a> and Diane Williams<\/a>, Emre says, refuse to offer much in the way of characterization, tropes, or even narrative, and thus force readers to work through the difficulties of such deceptively simple stories. Playing with syntax, punctuation, and other fundamentals of grammar in like these miniature authors do highlights (Emre concludes) how “grammar can be where the human makes its mark.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n